FengshuiCalculator

Sydney Opera House 悉尼歌劇院 terrain case

Three sides open water, southern hemisphere: the four-意象 labels (azure dragon / white tiger sectors) follow the compass, and the kernel just reports elevation symmetry. Also an honest case for why "sitting direction" needs a compass or solar sighting — never a photo.

The building, on the record

LocationSydney, Australia · -33.8568, 151.2153
Built1959–1973
Sitting/facing (literature)modern building — no classical sitting/facing; terrain reported without one
SourceBennelong Point is a peninsula jutting into Sydney Harbour; the site is water on three sides

We did not measure anything on site — the sitting direction is quoted from the public record, and this page says so wherever the direction matters.

Terrain, as the model sees it

360-azimuth skyline sampled once from SRTM 30 m (a terrain model — no buildings) at 350 / 700 / 1200 / 2500 m rings, frozen on 2026-10-27. Ground elevation at the sample point: 22.0 m. Highest skyline angle: 3.7° at 230° azimuth.

Sector (±45°)Max elevationMean
North (玄武 seat)1.8°0.8°
East (青龙)0.6°0.0°
South (朱雀 face)3.0°1.0°
West (白虎)3.7°0.8°

Interactive version with a draggable panorama and a sitting slider: open this location in the terrain tool.

White-tiger check — honestly not run

This is a modern building with no classical sitting/facing direction, and the white-tiger judgment is defined relative to a sitting direction. Without one there is nothing to compute — so the page does not pretend. (This is also why "what direction does my building face" needs a compass or a sun sighting — never a photo.)

If you go and measure

Model magnetic declination here (WMM2025): 12.8° east. The honest sequence: take a compass bearing of the building axis (or of the sun with the solar compass), subtract the declination your instrument actually shows, and compare with the literature direction above — the difference is the interesting part, and it is a measurement, not an opinion.

Honest boundaries